Search results for "lattice [space-time]"
showing 10 items of 692 documents
Non-constructive Methods for Finite Probabilistic Automata
2007
Size (the number of states) of finite probabilistic automata with an isolated cut-point can be exponentially smaller than the size of any equivalent finite deterministic automaton. The result is presented in two versions. The first version depends on Artin's Conjecture (1927) in Number Theory. The second version does not depend on conjectures but the numerical estimates are worse. In both versions the method of the proof does not allow an explicit description of the languages used. Since our finite probabilistic automata are reversible, these results imply a similar result for quantum finite automata.
Counting with Probabilistic and Ultrametric Finite Automata
2014
We investigate the state complexity of probabilistic and ultrametric finite automata for the problem of counting, i.e. recognizing the one-word unary language \(C_n=\left\{ 1^n \right\} \). We also review the known results for other types of automata.
Language Recognition Power and Succinctness of Affine Automata
2016
In this work we study a non-linear generalization based on affine transformations of probabilistic and quantum automata proposed recently by Diaz-Caro and Yakaryilmaz [6] referred as affine automata. First, we present efficient simulations of probabilistic and quantum automata by means of affine automata which allows us to characterize the class of exclusive stochastic languages. Then, we initiate a study on the succintness of affine automata. In particular, we show that an infinite family of unary regular languages can be recognized by 2-state affine automata, whereas the number of states of any quantum and probabilistic automata cannot be bounded. Finally, we present the characterization …
Quantum Pushdown Automata
2000
Quantum finite automata, as well as quantum pushdown automata were first introduced by C. Moore, J. P. Crutchfield [13]. In this paper we introduce the notion of quantum pushdown automata (QPA) in a non-equivalent way, including unitarity criteria, by using the definition of quantum finite automata of [11]. It is established that the unitarity criteria of QPA are not equivalent to the corresponding unitarity criteria of quantum Turing machines [4]. We show that QPA can recognize every regular language. Finally we present some simple languages recognized by QPA, two of them are not recognizable by deterministic pushdown automata and one seems to be not recognizable by probabilistic pushdown …
One Alternation Can Be More Powerful Than Randomization in Small and Fast Two-Way Finite Automata
2013
We show a family of languages that can be recognized by a family of linear-size alternating one-way finite automata with one alternation but cannot be recognized by any family of polynomial-size bounded-error two-way probabilistic finite automata with the expected runtime bounded by a polynomial. In terms of finite automata complexity theory this means that neither 1Σ2 nor 1Π2 is contained in 2P2.
Artin’s Conjecture and Size of Finite Probabilistic Automata
2008
Size (the number of states) of finite probabilistic automata with an isolated cut-point can be exponentially smaller than the size of any equivalent finite deterministic automaton. The result is presented in two versions. The first version depends on Artin's Conjecture (1927) in Number Theory. The second version does not depend on conjectures but the numerical estimates are worse. In both versions the method of the proof does not allow an explicit description of the languages used. Since our finite probabilistic automata are reversible, these results imply a similar result for quantum finite automata.
The complexity of probabilistic versus deterministic finite automata
1996
We show that there exists probabilistic finite automata with an isolated cutpoint and n states such that the smallest equivalent deterministic finite automaton contains \(\Omega \left( {2^{n\tfrac{{\log \log n}}{{\log n}}} } \right)\) states.
Hopcroft’s Algorithm and Cyclic Automata
2008
Minimization of deterministic finite automata is a largely studied problem of the Theory of Automata and Formal Languages. It consists in finding the unique (up to isomorphism) minimal deterministic automaton recognizing a set of words. The first approaches to this topic can be traced back to the 1950’s with the works of Huffman and Moore (cf. [12,15]). Over the years several methods to solve this problem have been proposed but the most efficient algorithm in the worst case was given by Hopcroft in [11]. Such an algorithm computes in O(n log n) the minimal automaton equivalent to a given automaton with n states. The Hopcroft’s algorithm has been widely studied, described and implemented by …
Postselection Finite Quantum Automata
2010
Postselection for quantum computing devices was introduced by S. Aaronson[2] as an excitingly efficient tool to solve long standing problems of computational complexity related to classical computing devices only. This was a surprising usage of notions of quantum computation. We introduce Aaronson's type postselection in quantum finite automata. There are several nonequivalent definitions of quantumfinite automata. Nearly all of them recognize only regular languages but not all regular languages. We prove that PALINDROMES can be recognized by MM-quantum finite automata with postselection. At first we prove by a direct construction that the complement of this language can be recognized this …
Quantum Finite Multitape Automata
1999
Quantum finite automata were introduced by C. Moore, J. P. Crutchfield [4], and by A. Kondacs and J. Watrous [3]. This notion is not a generalization of the deterministic finite automata. Moreover, in [3] it was proved that not all regular languages can be recognized by quantum finite automata. A. Ambainis and R. Freivalds [1] proved that for some languages quantum finite automata may be exponentially more concise rather than both deterministic and probabilistic finite automata. In this paper we introduce the notion of quantum finite multitape automata and prove that there is a language recognized by a quantum finite automaton but not by deterministic or probabilistic finite automata. This …